Federal drug laws create a labeling issue. When you hear the term "drug trafficker," you might think of Pablo Escobar or Walter White, however the reality is that under federal law, drug traffickers include individuals who purchase pseudo-ephedrine for their methamphetamine dealer; serve as middleman in a series of little transactions; or perhaps pick up a travel suitcase for the incorrect friend. Thanks to conspiracy laws, everybody on the totem pole can be subject to the very same severe compulsory minimum sentences.
To the men and ladies who prepared our federal drug laws in 1986, this might come as a surprise. According to Sen. Robert Byrd, cosponsor of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the factor to connect five- and ten-year necessary sentences to drug trafficking was to punish "the kingpins-- the masterminds who are truly running these operations", and the mid-level dealers.
Fast forward twenty-five years. Today, nearly everyone founded guilty of a federal drug crime is founded guilty of "drug trafficking", which generally leads to at least a 5- or ten-year necessary jail sentence. That's a lot of time in federal jail for lots of people who are minor parts of drug trade, the huge bulk of whom are men and women of color.
This is the system that federal district Judge Mark Bennett sees every day. Judge Bennett sits on the district court in northern Iowa, and he handles a lot of drug cases., I would have sent out 1,092 of my fellow people to federal prison for compulsory minimum sentences ranging from sixty months to life without the possibility of release.
The numbers can't communicate the absurd disaster of all of it. This is how he describes a current drug trafficking case:
I recently sentenced a group of more than twenty offenders on meth trafficking conspiracy charges. Eighteen were 'pill smurfers,' as federal district attorneys put it, implying their function amounted to routinely purchasing and delivering cold medication to meth cookers in exchange for extremely little, low-grade quantities to feed their serious addictions. All of them faced necessary minimum sentences of sixty or 120 months.
There is data to suggest that Judge Bennett's experience is not uncharacteristic. In 2007, the U.S. Sentencing Commission put together considerable information on cocaine and crack sentencing. They found that in 2005, most of the lowest-level drug- and crack-trafficking offenders-- men and women described as "street-level dealerships", "couriers/mules", and "renter/loader/lookout/ enabler/users"-- got 5- or ten-year mandatory prison sentences. This is particularly real for crack-cocaine offenders, the majority of whom are black; despite the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, selling a small quantity of crack drug (28 grams) brings the very same mandatory minimum sentence-- five years-- as selling 500 grams of powder drug.
This is the truth for which proponents of extreme federal drug laws should account. We can not pretend that heavy sentences for ladies like Kemba Smith and males like Jamel Dossie are the fluke errors of overboard laws. We need to admit that our sentencing of minor individuals in www.criminallawyerslasvegas.com/drug-conspiracy-defense-las-vegas the drug trade to prison terms indicated for the leaders of big drug organizations-- as a common event, not as an exception. As a result, we needlessly lock up great deals of small offenders for extended periods. Judge Bennett decries the human costs of these sentences:
If lengthy mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug addicts really worked, one might be able to rationalize them. I have seen how they leave hundreds of thousands of young children parent less and thousands of aging, infirm and passing away moms and dads childless.
Here, once again, we have proof that Judge Bennett is right: long mandatory sentences are unnecessary for many drug wrongdoers. In 2002 and 2003, Michigan and NYC repealed necessary sentences for drug transgressors and offered judges the power to enforce much shorter sentences, probation, or drug treatment. The sky didn't fall, but crime rates did. So did jail expenses.
For decades, Judge Bennett has seen a system that does not make sense. He has actually seen mandatory laws composed for the most serious, massive drug dealers applied to the men and women on the lowest rungs of the drug trade, and he has seen it occur a lot. We once thought of that serious obligatory sentences would be utilized to handle the leaders of big drug operations. It's time our federal drug laws were fit to the people that they really target.
If you have been charged with a drug related offense and need qualified representation, contact us to discuss your case.
Contact:
Mace Yampolsky & Associates
625 S 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-9777